Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.”
Our life has a great revolution since the advent of Cars. Although cars have many advantages, they have some disadvantages which should be considered. They can increase air pollution and cause some serious traffic problems in big cities. I think governments should devise solutions to prevent of using cars and it happens now so I believe cars using will decrease in the near future.
To begin with, air pollution and living costs are a hot problem in new societies. Without a doubt, cars have an impact on air pollution. It raises several concerns about some problems like global warming and decreasing using of cars can be one of the solutions to prevent more contamination. The states should advertise people to avoid using their cars and provide their citizens with more facilities for transporting. By giving more information about the importance of such problems causes by using cars people will get more awareness about their role in their society. Furthermore, living costs are much more than any time before, and people’s priority is changed. They prefer to spend their money wisely or save it for their children future instead of buying a car. I imagine a future in which people are aware of the care of their environments and put their money aside for other important things because transportation systems are more convenient than cars.
Secondly, in big cities, traffic issues become a crucial topic and governments should find a brilliant way to avoid it. A vast number of cars in the metropolises has an impact on everybody’s life. People in big cities usually struggle with traffics and parking areas which can waste their time and money. For instance, in the capital city of Iran, huge traffic forces people to leave their home two or even three hours sooner to go their work because at morning citizens face with an ocean of cars on the street. People who used to drive their own car in such cities nowadays prefer to use public transportation because it helps them to save their time. By using public transportation, they do not struggle with finding parking areas which can take much time sometimes. In addition, governments try to keep public transportation costs as low as possible and increase cars taxes also they encourage people to use taxis and buses instead. I think people found their benefits to use of public transportations sooner or later.
In conclusion, I believe that cars using will be decreased in twenty years. Because of the air pollution which cars have a significant role and other problems like the traffic issues that can convince people to use their cars fewer than before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-04 | stupidfella | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.” 71
- Part-time job is beneficial for young people. Do you agree or disagree with the statement. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir and claims about the validation of the memoir 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people. Some people say that government should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both th 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97052154195 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71887665212 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49433106576 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5313532862 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0454545455 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187030332829 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667024287166 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533960424174 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141547040151 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045938636233 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.