Some universities deduct students' work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some
alternative actions?
Recently universities deduction has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is there any alternative way for students who gave their assignments after the due date?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that students must remain liable for their delay. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, delays in giving assignments are bound up inextricably with students' recklessness, which indicates they lead to both cognitive skills and educational systems. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2012 demonstrates the relationship between self-control developments and academic exams as well as an exponential increase in poor performances. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of students' work is correlated positively with not only late deliveries but also universities departments.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, university deductions attribute to disorganized curriculums, in that it would come down to the team working, essays, and responsibilities. A salient example of such attribution is social training, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take acceptable behaviors for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint self-disciplines problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to learning achievements, failures, and even tight controls. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of mutual respects.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that there should be a mutual understanding and cooperations between universities and students. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Hurry | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | 6tttcj | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Kushi | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | reza_irani | 85 | view |
- Some universities deduct students' work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions? 88
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- The advanced medical technology has a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 88
- With the digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Uneversities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your ow 88
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. How realistic do you think it is and what do you see in its potential benefits and problems? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8976109215 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39241249453 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689419795222 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5077514722 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15509478401 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392315115696 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561934684761 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862065677188 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449258973473 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.