People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Among various qualities a human being is bestowed with, the ability to make good decisions is of primal importance. Those individuals who lack this ability are the ones who are often looked down upon. So, everyone is found to have the tendency of making appropriate decisions at every stage of their lives.
Now what makes one a good decision maker or a poor decision maker? Well there are several factors which govern this trait of humans. First of all let it be cleared that a particular individual is not to be labeled as a good or poor decision maker. There are several occasions where s/he is able to make logical decisions and it could be other way round at some other occasions. Same is the case with other human beings. So, let us talk about a particular decision. What makes it good, bolstered with logic, or poor, without any logical ground? The following paragraphs follow this discussion.
Well, as I mentioned earlier that several factors do affect the decision making ability of an individual at a particular stage of his/her life. Among them are the previous knowledge about the subject (on which the decision is to be made), emotional attachment (of the person who has to make a decision) with the subject, expertise on the subject etc. Emotional attachment with the subject happens to be one of the dominating factors. Now, are the decisions based on emotions justifiable with logic or are they mere poor decisions?, is a topic which requires thorough analysis.
There are several occasions where the decisions based on emotion prove to be right. For example if a person got a decent job in any foreign country, but at his homeland, he has his ailing parents who don't have anyone except their son to look after. If this individual is emotionally connected with his parents he will of course skip the opportunity to go foreign for a job with decent salary. This decision, on superficial basis, seems not a good one, but in reality he will enjoy the warm company of his parents, who will always make prayers for him in return
But on several occasions decisions based on emotion prove to be wrong.
Summarily I would like to state that it is
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 54
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 43
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client. “Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experi 55
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...homeland, he has his ailing parents who dont have anyone except their son to look af...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, well, as to, for example, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74468085106 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55627030679 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505319148936 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.989126243 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431566488708 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134658890037 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115772603782 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223448701076 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129304652583 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.