Do you agree or disagree? To improve quality of education university should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Throughout history, the university has played a prominent role in all societies. Dou to it is paramount importance university in the modern era professors are of great importance. A controversial question which is often raised this idea improve the salary professors. Some people may hold the view that increases the wage of the professors is essential for promoting quality of instruction. However, some other may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that enhances the salary teachers not bring about have the high quality of education. I personally content that promote the wage of professor is the right effect on the quality of education. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite to be mentioned that increases wage of professors provokes teachers to better works. To elaborate on my point, since teachers have a beneficial wage, they endeavor to grow the quality of the university. Also, they effort to grow up the active students; hence, the students who have creative and happiness teachers can excellent focus on the study. I believe that the high rank of universities not only have high salary for the professors but also have elevated quality of learning. A significant example that strikes my mind is about the Sharif University. The Sharif University is one of the high rank of the university in Iran. Owing to have the high quality of learning, students must pay to evaluate tuition for education so that most of this fee spend for the salary of professors.
In addition, I believe that professors must have a high rank of wage. Inasmuch as young people are studying in the university, they can make future of country; therefore, professors must spend many times to proper this person who study at the university for promoting future of the country. Hence, when the wage is increased, the professors oblige promote grade teaching in the university. Furthermore, I believe that most university for absorbing the high rank of teachers, they need pay a lot of money for this teachers, therefore, it can help to promote the quality of the education.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that each university must improve the wage of professors. The increase in the salary not only trigger for teachers to studying in a famous university, but also promote the equality of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree? in order to be well-information, a person must get information from many different resource. 70
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- TPO 47 70
- TPO 25 3
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e into the most outstanding reasons. The first exquisite to be mentioned that...
^^^
Line 8, column 509, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...chers, they need pay a lot of money for this teachers, therefore, it can help to pro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09367088608 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88802510241 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448101265823 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0053433931 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242497404286 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779246693972 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688120666653 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164371910499 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222303626955 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.