School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in classroom at all costs and go back to teaching study skills. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent few decades, science and technology has advanced with leaps and bounds. Meanwhile, computers managed to make their vital place in all the spheres of human life. This has heavily impacted every nook and corner of world. The usage of computers nowadays starts with cradle to the grave. So it is suggested that teachers should avoid using computers in the classroom ambiance and concentrate more in the traditional reading and writing skills with traditional practices. This essay accedes with the notion and provides some empirical reasons for this disagreement.
To begin with, usage of the computers in the early stage of life has numerous detrimental consequences. First of all, the early usage of technical gadgets leads to improper development of mental abilities of an individual. To enumerate, when children start reading books on computers and on smart phones their reading abilities diminish. For example, according to a recent survey nowadays in developed countries children can read the books on portable devices such as I-pads and other smart phones and consequently have negative impacts on the overall development of children.
Further, using advanced technical equipments have harmful impact on the writing skills of children as well. Firstly, by using such intelligent devices children suffer in writing skills. In other words, with the usage of the computers in the classroom children are discouraged to use pencils and pens and thereby writing skills do not develop. Moreover, by following such kind of practices there is no mental exercise for children resulting improper brain functioning in children. For instance, many developed countries are already suffering from mental diseases owing to the rampant use of such technical devices.
In the light of these facts one can conclude that, in order to improve mental and intellectual growth of children technical devices such as computers and smart phones should be avoided by educators.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-16 | olimboy olimov | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-16 | olimboy olimov | 78 | view |
- How important is it for individuals and countries to think about the future rather than to focus on the present 80
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in classroom at all costs and go back to teaching study skills. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays for many people the internet is replacing regular books What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion about this trend 73
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 78
- In many countries the quality of life in the large cities is becoming worse What causes this problem What measure can be taken to solve it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4332247557 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74951755565 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537459283388 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9003690554 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205398165638 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703902149709 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497313677062 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11770373947 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414895003553 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.