School children are becoming far too dependent on computers This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills Teachers need to avoid using computers in classroom at all costs and go back to teaching study skills Do you agree or disagree

School pupils are relying on using computers and this situation triggers to impact on the literature and writing mastery of students. As a result of that many people emphasize that teachers should underline to children that they need to prevent themselves from utilizing gadgets, especially in the classrooms. In addition, the old public intends to return to the previous system of teaching system without tablets. This essay will discuss the agreements and disagreements about becoming reliant on any type of technology.

The purpose of using computers provides us with a great amount of knowledge and schools should be maintained with special technological items to teach children properly. When it comes to the capabilities of adolescence in literacy and dissertation, there are great immense benefits. For example, online-based classes are popular inside youngsters and they are showing enthusiasm regarding acquiring education via desktop. To conclude that laptop is a source of gaining knowledge.

Nevertheless, dependence on internet appliances causes isolation for school people because, after the subjects, they also attempt to spend their time in front of the personal computer. Educational centers need to program their devices thoroughly and all of their functions of them should be regulated by a special constructor. Many scientists concluded that daily usage of gadgets should be only three hours in terms of health. The capabilities of writing are being reduced by using computers and our literacy level is appearing to be lessened by workstations in consequence of various and dirt information on websites.

In conclusion, returning to the education of fundamental skills of students about computers will not be a key solution for upgrading the level of reading and writing expertise and mentors should alter the way of giving data by mobile devices.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... using computers and our literacy level is appearing to be lessened by workstations in conse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51736111111 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99874386961 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9920048594 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.230769231 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178719564473 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531003748184 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504246873163 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103823111331 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323532727624 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... using computers and our literacy level is appearing to be lessened by workstations in conse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51736111111 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99874386961 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9920048594 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.230769231 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178719564473 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531003748184 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504246873163 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103823111331 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323532727624 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.