The reading ,which is done by people for pleasure can help in improving vision and in depth knowledge of language as compared to television, which is prefered by some other people. I agree that reading for amusement purpose can develop appreciable skills of language. However, contribution of television in upsurging imagination and in developing language skills cannot be overlooked.
The books contains a plethora of knowledge and varied ideas, which can prove to be beneficial for a person, in having excellent command over language and broadening his horizon. For instance, fiction novels are completely based on imagination, so this type of novels can make a person more imaginative in his real life. People can hone their language skills by reading, because books oftenly contain a vast vocabulary, which can help people to gain extended knowledge of language. For example, non fiction books and autobiographies consists of different types of tenses and these can help in increasing language skills
Watching television can also affect person's point of view towards different things and can improve language, as variety of programs are telecasted on it everyday, which are very useful in making better imagination of a person. For instance, a person tends to think about upcoming episode's content which helps in making his imagination better. Moving ahead, visual things pose an impact on mind of a person, hence a person can gain language skills and develop imagination unknowingly , as television leaves a long lasting effect on person's mind. Therefore, in this way television hones language skills and a vision of person
In conclusion, despite reading can make imagination and language skills better but the role of television is also significant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
The reading ,which is done by people for pleasure can...
^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'contain'.
Suggestion: contain
...ills cannot be overlooked. The books contains a plethora of knowledge and varied idea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ariety of programs are telecasted on it everyday, which are very useful in making better...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ills and develop imagination unknowingly , as television leaves a long lasting eff...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37184115523 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88969620983 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537906137184 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.1458023087 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245836532906 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11876607708 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542343778343 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175362991649 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576433516685 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.