The line graph illustrates how many students were registered in Riverside school and Litchfield school in each of the years from 2011 to 2015. The number of students at each school changed each year.
Overall, while enrollment changed each year at both schools, the number of students of Riverside school rose whereas the equivalent figure for enrolled students of Litchfield school fell.
Regarding Riverside school, enrollment increased in general over this period given. In 2011, about 1000 students enrolled in this school. After that, the figure increased smoothly and reached to just over 1000 students in 2012 and started to rise more rapidly. There were 1200 students enrolled in Riverside school. Also, we can see that enrollment saw more rapid growth and hit to 1400 students in 2014.
Eight hundred students were registered in Litchfield school in 2011, and figure remained stable to 2012. By the contrast of Riverside school's enrollment, the number of students that entered Litchfield school decreased gradually from about 800 pills in 2012 to about 700 students in 2014.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the graph below shows the number of students enrolled in universities by gender within three years in country A 58
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city, by gender.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 56
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31791907514 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51275605629 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508670520231 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6937102771 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196749284514 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104255348369 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493267232565 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146279850199 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378554031308 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.