parents should be held legally responsible for the children’s act. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parental responsibilities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of children's activities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that legal activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, kids' behaviour can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of respecting the law, as well as different upbringing methods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered strict social rules. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both family rules and well-behaved families apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, legal responsibilities might increase the consequences of becoming a criminal. Moreover, fundamental aspects of illegal acts would relate to this reality that the demerits of polite parents pertain to being against law. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of capturing by police is correlated negatively with going to jail. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of developed societies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of parental control far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of parental activities prove the significance of illegal activities, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- For governments and organizations, what is a critical global problem and what is thesolution? 88
- Computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value. What's your opinion? 88
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. 88
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 88
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67716535433 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30444213729 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673228346457 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5066929007 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138570813927 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452872675551 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414778546234 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764315825815 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432744675964 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.