Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people. discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of job opportunities for the youngster and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of job variety is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that part-time jobs can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, young employees can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of full-time labors, as well as freelancers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of job offers for talented people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the ageing population and old officers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, early retirement might increase the consequences of low income. Moreover, the fundamental elements of high taxation rate might relate to this reality that the demerits of an underpaid worker pertain to expensive housing. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of soon retirement is correlated negatively with life expectancy. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of creating jobs and opportunities for young people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of providing job vacancies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of well-paid jobs prove the significance of easy employment process, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-20 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 88
- Do you think consumers should avoid the purchase of over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views with any relevant example pf your own experience. 88
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, what's your opinions and solutions? 88
- Whether experimental learning/practical learning can work well in formal education/traditional teaching, agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54104477612 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22362794408 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65671641791 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1359177736 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310516653133 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940835241895 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921791338492 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152568274128 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754935677142 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.