some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to share freely.
In today's world, there is an enormous controversy for the topic that the information should be shared freely or not, especially in the sectors like business, educational and scientific. I believe that it depends on the type and purpose of the information Let us look it from both perspectives in the above paragraph.
It is widely believed that many brains can reduce the efforts and increase the efficiency of a particular task. However, to complete that task successfully, the team plays an important role. The most vital task in a group is to spread the information among each other while it can also help in maintaining good relation among employees or student, they might feel more connected, can get social easily and can work together more often. For instance, the work comparison of the one student and group of student is drastic, the group can manage to do the work in fewer hours and can represent very well output whereas the student alone can not make it in time despite of amount of knowledge he might have. This shows the importance of awareness of information among each other.
On the other hand, some corporation has classified information of their product or research. They spend a gargantuan amount of money on research and development, in this case spreading knowledge can lead to a great loss. It can be seen in the following example, the Samsung planning to launch foldable phone next year, but the information regarding this technology has not been revealed because other company can imitate their design. If the company will share the information about it, it may face a huge financial crisis in the future. So, some information should not be disclosed until a specific period of time.
In conclusion, the sharing of information is totally dependent on its type and purpose. As a team, awareness can play an essential role for the efficiency of a task and making relations while in the competition, it can result in an enormous loss because some information is too valuable or too important to be shared freely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Moustafa Noufale | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | gudupatnaik1996 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Mohammadjavad | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | mytran234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Mishika sugandhi | 61 | view |
- some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to share freely. 73
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company, while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rentedaccommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hould not be disclosed until a specific period of time. In conclusion, the sharing of infor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91907514451 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79186562757 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3471057512 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277693212824 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104050274023 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695135697092 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183290433766 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720370684091 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.