The graph indicates individuals who attended in cinema in 4 terms of age. This graph covers 26 years during the 1984-2000 and the vertical axis shows amount of attendance in percentage for 4 group of ages.
The greatest increase among the other groups goes for 15-24 age group. Between 1984-2000 this group has 34 percent enhancement although it has modest fluctuation from 1990 until 1996.
Cinema attendance followed a similar figure until 1997 for 25-35 and 7-14 age groups by a gradual increase. After that there is a negligible incline for latter one and rise and fall erratically for former group.
over 35 years old group, illustrate a slight increase, approximately 2 % to 12% between 1984-2000.
Totally, the graph shows enhance tend to all the groups during 26 year wich is shown
- Some people support the development in agriculture such as factory farming and scientificcreation of new types of fruits and vegetables. Others oppose this view and support otherdevelopments. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 11
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from bluesky university in 2006 entiring different employment sectors. 61
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from bluesky university in 2006 entiring different employment sectors. 61
- Some people think that there are now too many cars on the roads, and they are spoiling ourtowns and cities.Do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...nd fall erratically for former group. over 35 years old group, illustrate a slight...
^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the groups during 26 year wich is shown
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 663.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 132.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02272727273 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38956122427 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64847422842 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.69696969697 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 182.7 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.3374636393 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.875 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189646595012 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102042865528 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108764565544 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112249735818 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107929732015 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.