The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Given is the table providing statistical information about the people’s preference in various types of travel in England, across 15 years. From an overall perspective, it can be noted that, the average distance traveled by all modes soared by 1,735 miles and the most popular type of vehicle was cars.
As will be observed, the most striking alterations relate to the usage of long distance buses and taxis which showed almost a threefold increase during the indicated period. In contrast, travelling on foot, on bicycles and on local buses lost popularity, to be more precise, declined by 18, 10 and 155 miles respectively.
As mentioned above, cars were the most preferred type of transportation and ranked the first in both years. Statics regarding the trains and other vehicles showed identical pattern, to be more specific, both figures slightly soared between 1985 and 2000.
All in all, travelling habits of English people has noticeably changed from 1985 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 75
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 90
- The table below shows the consumer durables owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. 80
- The pie-charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 90
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. 87
travelling habits of English people has noticeably changed from 1985 and 2000.
travelling habits of English people have noticeably changed from 1985 and 2000.
flaws:
No. of Words: 158 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 792 1000
No. of Different Words: 109 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.013 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.653 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.747 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.425 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.754 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.055 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4