Some people believe that parents should be obliged to immunize their children against childhood disease. However, others think that individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Childhood diseases are considered to pose a great threat to children’s development. While some hold a belief that it is parents’ onus to cloak their children under protection by preventative medicine against dreadful diseases, others might contend that they own their freedom of choice to have their children vaccinated. From my perspective, it is partly true that parents must take responsibility of immunizing their children, yet I am also inclined to the freedom of parents’ decision in this case.
On the one hand, it is argued by some that vaccinating children should have been rendered mandatory in every part of the world. Having children immunized by preventative medicine has been scientifically proven and embraced by a majority of fathers and mothers due to its effectiveness and safety. Apparently, children themselves are vulnerable against fatal childhood diseases. Governmental bodies, therefore, are in favor of spreading implementation of this medical approach to reduce the incident of deadly childhood illnesses. Indeed, not only relevant legislation have many competent authorities around the globe imposed but they have been making constant effort to disseminate abundant propaganda advocating such actions as well.
However, those opposing to such a view would reckon that whether parents opt for vaccination or not is of their free will. To begin with, the expense of providing vaccinating immunization for children may financially burdened impoverished families, especially those in undeveloped or developing countries. In fact, many Third World nations demonstrate their incapability in affording free or low-cost vaccination for all children owing to the unreasonably high price for its mass production. Another point worth mentioning is that, despite the unimaginable low possibilities, children still attainably undergo some threats and hazards. It has been reported, actually, that several sporadic cases of allergy or shock medication towards immunizing medicine recorded all over the world.
To sum up, I strongly believe that the practice of vaccinating is essentially offered to defend during children’s vulnerability phase, but it is still needed to take to responsibility – takers’ situation and other affecting factors into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-19 | baomap22000 | 89 | view |
- Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. 78
- What matters to you and why? 80
- What matters to you. And why? 11
- In some parts of the world it is becoming increasingly popular to try to find out one's own family history. Why? Positive or negative? 84
- Some people say that it is possible for a county to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to free'
Suggestion: to free
...nstrate their incapability in affording free or low-cost vaccination for all childre...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, third, well, while, in fact, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82544378698 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28851044849 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636094674556 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4269714853 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.642857143 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31696119527 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103325941002 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609598651118 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175819778352 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812253013158 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.