Some people say that it is possible for a county to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
The global economy is growing at a startling pace. However, this prosperity comes at the cost of environmental degradation on an unprecedented scale. Some people assume that this is inevitable while environmental advocates find the coexistence of blooming economy and clean habitats practicable. From my perspective, both sides have their own merits.
It is arguable that the economic prosperity is deeply rooted in the advancement of technology which, in order to reach this cutting-edge level, has disposed an immeasurable amount of industrial waste. For instance, the release of CFC, a chemical that is held responsible for the ozone holes, is a direct consequence from the development of industrial refrigeration and cooling systems. Hardly can any measures safeguard the environment from such destruction. A salient example of this is China. Owing to such alarming pollution level, the affluent dwelling in capital city have imported Canadian fresh air compressed in iron bottles at an exorbitant price for breathing purpose only. Furthermore, in business practice, profits are usually prioritized. Manufacturers have to make sure that their actual revenues reach the calculation before fulfilling their duties to the environment.
However, an unspoiled/intact environment can still be found in highly developed nations such as Singapore and New Zealand, serving as counter examples to the tradeoff theory between economic well-being and environmental contamination. It is noteworthy that these nations have boasted leading economies as well as high intellectual levels for decades, and thus can fully grasp the paramount importance of a multifaceted development, which gives equal weight to both financial growth and ecological balance. Specifically, these nations, among others, are the early birds/the pioneers to join the Paris Accord on environmental protection, which guides and encourages member countries to place a quota on their greenhouse gas emissions. Voluntary as they may be, these courses of actions act to raise the awareness of global citizens on environmental issues, shedding light on the fact that if we maintain our current pace of exploiting our mother nature, it is only a matter of time until the Earth exhausted of all the resources that can sustain life.
In conclusion, many rising stars in the global economy enjoy impressive growth rates, but at the expense of taking a toll on the environment, and in turns, their citizens. Economic superpowers, in contrast, have proven that a simultaneous development, balancing the ecological needs with financial demands, is attainable.
- What matters to you. And why? 16
- What matters to you. And why? 11
- What matters to you. And why? 80
- Do you think it is better to send criminals to prison or let them receive education or job trainings? 84
- Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63544303797 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2149965057 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622784810127 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.9778948699 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.941176471 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172456093378 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461123728365 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398808654686 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983688058802 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334545441579 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.