The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

The pie chart illustrates amounts of money, dedicates to specific school in UK during two decades ,in 1981,1991,2001.

With a short glimpse, it is clears that expenditures on salaries are much above than the others, approximately half on money goes for teacher salary in these years. Furniture and equipment was fluctuated as same as other works salaries with a little different in last year that in my opinion it is result of normal inflation in country. Insurance had have a steady increase in 1981 by 2% and 1991 by 3% and 2001 by 8% that it indicates the prominent of this issue in recent years. I have to mention that resources had ups and downs in terms of 15% in 1981, 20% in 1991, 9% in 2001.

Totally, this chart asserts the money which is payed for annual salaries is not comparable with the other activity and I think it is intellectual.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...specific school in UK during two decades ,in 1981,1991,2001. With a short glimp...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...mal inflation in country. Insurance had have a steady increase in 1981 by 2% and 199...
^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctivity and I think it is intellectual.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, i think, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63815789474 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74485637071 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664473684211 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8691017574 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206374223263 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105707711835 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104392837732 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159246060875 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105766433547 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.