The given chart compares the proportion of six kinds of resources contributing to generate the power in three separate years, namely 1970, 1980, and 1990.
Overall, as can be seen in the pie chart, hydro is the most utilized resources in 1970 and 1980. Geothermal was the second largest resource being used in 1970, and became the biggest percentage in the year 1990. Furthermore, it was not until 1980 than the nuclear power was taken advantage of.
Turning into detail, it is salient that the dominant resource is the hydro in both 1970 and 1980, accounting for 45% and 76%, respectively. By the same token, the geothermal resource was the second place in 1970 and 1980, comprising nearly a quarter in 1970, and declining to below 10% in 1980. Nevertheless, by the year 1990, it is interesting to note that “lion shares” was attributed to the geothermal, making up approximately 40% of the whole. Meanwhile, the hydro resource fell into the second place, taking up about one three.
The most striking point is that there had been no utilization of nuclear before 1980. However, the nuclear was the third largest source of power by the year 1990, constituting roughly a quarter of the entire resource.
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past Some people argue that this is because competition for jobs is greater than it used to be Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to d 61
- The table shows the tourist numbers and tourist spending in five countries in 2012 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- Individual can do nothing to help improve the environment; only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97073170732 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73553738466 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3512767442 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0737574502525 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337165341128 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425056473204 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636208724064 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526343335567 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.