The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions and solutions.
Recently, the phenomenon of students' assignments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of punctual students is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that exam results can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, score deduction can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of university rules, as well as university faculties, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a solution for late assignments. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both elective courses and university staff apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, university students might increase the consequences of online courses. Moreover, fundamental aspects of teaching methods would relate to this reality that the demerits of preparing presentations pertain to educational issues. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of strict professors is correlated negatively with innovative opinions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of young lecturers.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of on-time assignment submission far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of reducing students' score prove the significance of additional educational programs, but also pinpoint modern teaching facilities implications.
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, what's your opinions and solutions? 88
- Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end? 77
- Should the government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 88
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport orshould build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81960784314 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27761036722 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678431372549 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4558364575 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226572655275 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633189043788 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620519750017 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109915006219 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752568605744 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.