Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company, while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Today, many organizations involve employees in the decision making process. Some people argue that decisions should only be taken by the management, while others feel that employees too should be a part of the decision making process. Both views will be discussed in this essay before a conclusion is made.
Managers have got wide experience and vast knowledge. They are familiar with the way the business operates. They are also aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their employees. This knowledge and experience allows them to make decisions that are beneficial to the company, its stakeholders and employees. What’s more, while making important decisions several confidential documents are taken into consideration. Security can be an issue if all employees are involved in the process.
On the flip side, there are many reasons for employees to participate in the decision making process. They also want to feel that their contribution is valued. If the management involves them in the decision making process they will feel more confident of their roles. This will encourage them to stay longer with the same organization. Studies have shown that one way of reducing the attrition rate is to involve employees while important decisions are made. Wrong decisions taken by the management can have a negative impact on the employees. If they are part of the decision making process, they will be able to make appropriate suggestions. In addition, employees who work in a transparent environment tend to have a better bond with their manager.
To conclude, there are many reasons to involve employees in the decision making process. While the organization does not have to discuss all the confidential information with them, they should at least be allowed to make decisions that have an impact on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-19 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | aloukik | 56 | view |
| 2018-02-16 | shrey250021 | 73 | view |
| 2015-07-03 | Khan | 60 | view |
| 2015-06-28 | avijit_05 | 70 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...feel that their contribution is valued. If the management involves them in the dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24315068493 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87947315334 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469178082192 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4946192009 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5789473684 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47368421053 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41433842812 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138597087393 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119304554712 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311046604193 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125503264713 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.