Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer
With the advance of technology, people have a world of technological devices right at their fingertips by which they can easily communicate with friends and colleagues. While some people believe that the face-to-face interaction cannot be replaced by this new type of communication, others believe that calling someone is the same (or is even more efficient) as talking with someone in person. In my opinion, face-to-face communication is better and more beneficial. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, communicating in person conveys emotions that cannot be expressed by letters or telephone calls. In fact, people do not interact just talking, but they also communicate with their body. My own experience is a compelling example of this. My girlfriend lives in Japan, that is 13 hours by flight from Italy: when I call her, I feel extremely sad since I wish she could stay next to me and stare my eyes. I think that looking people while talking is important because people are not robots, but they have feelings that come from their bodies. When I meet my girlfriend, I can talk to her in person and our relationship is more passionate and intense, since I can hug and kiss her. Thus, interacting with people in person allows people to express certain feelings which go beyond the mere words.
Second, face-to-face communication is necessary when people need to discuss about serious problems. For example, last year’s my father was offered a job in France and the company gave him two choices for the job meeting: going to the firm headquarters or having a Skype video-call. He chose to go to France even though this country is far, because he said that this was the only way to show his communication skills. Interaction abilities include not only the speaking skills, but also the ability to be a pleasant and elegant person.
All in all, this essay discussed why face-to-face interaction is better than communicating using technological devices. This is because people can transmit more feelings and because they need to show their communication skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-09 | xmen1404 | 81 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | MarcoC501 | 80 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | mardanpour | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-04 | bitessa | 70 | view |
| 2018-04-04 | Nadiyahemati | 30 | view |
- People learn better from those at their own level—such as teachers or supervisors—then from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors 76
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 80
- It has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books”. Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? Use specific reasons and examples t 80
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, second, so, thus, while, for example, i feel, i think, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03409090909 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90766455622 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4567355606 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.235294118 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16769848017 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632195476303 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741824857726 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120341124557 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657684487905 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.