Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
The statement suggest that the government should stop funding the scientific research whose consequences are unknown. Which means if the scientist want to perform a scientific experiment whose results or consequence are unknown then the government would not fund the experiment. I completely disagree with the idea. Following would be the consequences if the government implements the policy. It also explains my stand to disagree with this policy.
Firstly, all the greatest inventions that are done in the past are invented by the scientist doing research for something else. For example, X-Rays were invented while doing the research for the Ni-Cd (Nickel Cadmium) at high temperature. This study had no clear consequences but turns out it invented the technology that we all use in our day to day life. If the government had not supported the experiment by funding the research, we would have been unaware of the X-Rays.
Secondly, if government stops funding such research then the privet funding would fund the ongoing research and also the new research, that might not feel alarming at the beginning but the issue with privet funding is that they claim the consequences of the research and that privet company that funded the research would be the owner of the patent on that invention, the scientist would be getting a small loyalty over the selling of that patent making it expensive in the end to the consumer of those good which has been manufactured using patented methods due to the high profit margins of the company who has the patent. Thus, when privet body is there in the system it would do anything to make their margins go up. Government funding do acquire some part of the research as loyalty but the researcher or inventor has the primary right over the filed patent. So, this policy affects the healthy system of mutual profit of researcher or scientist and the consumer of the goods manufactured using patented method.
In conclusion I do not think it’s a good idea to stop funding any type of research as it increases our creativity and feeds out curiosity. Inventions are the by-product of the research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | skjasharif | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
The statement suggest that the government should stop funding...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons are the by-product of the research.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01680672269 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6891193974 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478991596639 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 134.307110757 60.3974514979 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 119.4 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37372624711 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13152944769 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139099845355 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225345598919 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102810027035 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.