Some universities deduct marks from students’ works if given in late, what are the problems and what is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of some universities deducting marks from students’ works if given in late in university and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the deducting marks can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, deducting marks can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, deducting marks might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting marks far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | msgnaneswaran | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | rajeshsamala | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | jaideep singh | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | jaideep singh | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- University will deduct the student's score for a late assignment. What are the reviews and possible solution of it? Discuss. 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76779026217 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30219007834 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63670411985 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0392996994 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203287642832 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683244156861 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967137184214 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113995142648 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690969580031 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.