literature
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the fact that people are reading less literature now than before. Whereas the reading passages states that this is a shame event, the lecture supports it indicating that people have other benefits instead of reading only literature.
First, according to the reading, young people are reading books containing less intellectual stimulation. However, the lecturer disputes this point. The professor says that young people read books about science, politics, and art, which have high intellectual stimulation. Moreover, those books contain high quality material to stimulate imagination.
Second, the reading claims that young people waste their time by watching TV, videos or searching on web pages. Nevertheless, the professor argues that listen to music or going to movies is not a waste of time because there are a lot of good pieces to appreciate. In addition, she said that the culture is changing and the artist and authors should be more direct with the audience.
Finally, the fact that currently there is less support to writer, is debated by the professor. She explains that the fault is, in some way, of the authors. She states that modern authors are difficult to understand, so young people prefer to change their cultural activities.
To conclude, the lecture casts doubt the reading by challenging the main points claiming the young people are less culture now than before.
- R. robustus 73
- Reading only literature 80
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Whichone of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s governmentto take to protect the environment.1. Fund the research to develop environmentally frie 76
- literature 3
- internet 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to change their cultural activities. To conclude, the lecture casts doubt the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59953463917 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569565217391 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3670638017 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8461538462 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0373699215319 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0143700768502 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497794064263 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0204320105388 0.162205337803 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408640210776 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.