The reading section elaborates three evidence of why cloud seeding, a way to add chemicals to clouds and transform hail into rain or snow, is practical. However, the speaker maintains that it\'s still not clear whether it\'s efficient or not, which contradicts what the author believes. In her lecture, she provides three convincing arguments to back up her idea.
To start with, the reading passage suggests that using cloud seeding could snow be created rather than hail according to laboratory experiments. Nonetheless, the professor refutes it that the effect of cloud seeding may be true in the process of transforming hail into the snow, but this measure is to blame for another problem. In reality, silver iodide has the ability to stop any precipitation from forming. That means there are no rains, snows or hails in clouds. As a consequence, the rainfall decreases, which increases the risks that drought occurs. Lack of water is another damage to crops.
Moreover, despite the statement in the article that cloud seeding has already been taken into use in some Asian urban areas, which shows a great result, the professor refutes it in the lecture that it\'s not clear whether we should repeat this method in the United States. For it\'s urban areas in Asia, there is serious air pollution from cars, which is a favorite condition for silver iodide to have an interaction between pollutants and chemicals. But in the United States, there is mostly not pollutant area in rural areas, so it might not work.
Finally, the writer has a notion that some local researches have shown that cloud seeding really helps a lot in protecting crops from the damage this year in the central United States. The listening passage, by contrast, puts forward a divergent opinion that the argument proposed by reading material is not convincing either. In that year, not only the place which research conducted in, but also some neighboring areas do not suffer hail. In other words, the whole region of that place has a decrease of hail damage. So it\'s more likely to be a natural variation of local weather that works rather than cloud seeding.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, may, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, still, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96378830084 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49749682645 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571030640669 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0771835868 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.823529412 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222020139124 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620442225156 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490537555897 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124672870576 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285906205457 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.