At a very young age, children already express certain interests or even talents in various musical instruments, language or even subjects, just to name a few. These days, parents start introducing different forms of art for example, learning the alphabet through using a song which helps the child remember better. These examples of tailoring the approach to each child is different, hence why would we subject our student to the same national curriculum in school.
If there was the same set of subjects mandated for students, there would be a severe decrease in diversification of courses. For example, schools would need to follow a list of subjects to be taught and this may not always include subjects out of the status quo. Such as subjects like art or music, design, information technology (IT). For the students, not all may excel in the 'expected' subjects such as Mathematics, Science and English, they may have talents elsewhere in design and media for example. These talents would go unrecognized leading to students being demoralized due to their low performance in subjects that are not fit to their capabilities.
Students with low morale could have many consequences such as an increase in school dropouts, increase in unemployment rates and more children unable to enter college. Hence, the impact is huge when they do not have access to a more diverse range of courses.
Furthermore, the courses available in college are vast and varied and high school would usually prepare the students for these courses. If following a national curriculum defines the subjects as limited, the students would not have the adequate pre-requisites required to enter college. If they are able to gain admission to such "out-of-the-box" courses such as media, design and IT, students may find themselves struggling to keep up with the fast-pace curriculum in college.
With the increasing need for new ideas in the modern world across all industries, such as a new range of the Iphones being released each year. Even in the medical field where computers are being developed to be stand-by doctors or pharmacists available 24 hours a day for advise. The need for diversity has never been more prominent.
Unless the standardized national curriculum can provide a varied range of courses suited to their students' talents, interests and skills, the same curriculum would not benefit these students. To top it all off, the students would not be sufficently prepared for the rigourous and diverse curriculum in college. In conclusion, a nation should not require the same curriculum before college.
- The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the university's burdensome breadth requirements. classen's job placement rate 55
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competetion 66
- We venerate loyalty – to our schools, employers, institutions, friends – as a virtue. Loyalty, however, can be at least as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one. 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- Statistics gathered over the past three decades show that the death rate is higher among those who do not have jobs than among those with regular employment. Unemployment, just like heart disease and cancer, is a significant health issue. While many healt 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iversity has never been more prominent. Unless the standardized national curricu...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ire the same curriculum before college.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21852731591 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96656612157 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520190023753 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2723872167 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.631578947 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26491426047 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937995650931 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119194954422 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149223292217 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129713650128 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.