The unlimited use of cars cause many problems. What are those problems ? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people ro use cars ?
Nowadays, with the rapid development of technology and science, having a car has become an essential part of many people’s lives. It can be undeniable that it offers flexibility to their life and work, however, this lead to a range number of danger issues for human beings which have been identified. While some people suggest that the government should enact a strict law to restrict use of cars, I firmly believe that it is not a good option to tackle these problems
The difficulties associated with frequent car use are becoming increasingly familiar to the general public. Firstly, the widespread use of cars has real environmental costs. Vehicles are the major source which releases a vast amount of toxic gas to the environment. It is reported that road traffic is the source of one-third of all harmful air pollution in the world. Specifically, carbon dioxide is created in operating of an internal combustion engine, which causes global warming or does a detriment to human health such as acid rain, greenhouse, and gas emission. Secondly, it is discernible that the use of cars makes a great contribution to create traffic congestion. As more and more citizens drive their own cars to work than a cycle or take public transport, there are heavy traffic jams almost every day at rush hours. Therefore, car accidents cause huge numbers of casualties every year.
To solve these problems, some people propose that the authority should impose a strict restriction on the use of cars, nevertheless, I do not think this is the best option, because this would lead to reduce mobility for people and decline in the car industry. I think a better solution would be for car manufacturers to design more environmentally friendly cars which run on solar power or hydrogen. Furthermore, traffic problems can be alleviated by building more underground tunnels and parking garages, and safety problems can be avoided by educating drivers as well as pedestrians to use greater caution on the road.
In conclusion, the role of the private car is not entirely replaceable soon but its effect on global change is easy to consider. In my opinion, while discouraging the car use might seem a quick solution to the problem the human is facing, it is mostly unlikely to be a permanent cure.
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The unlimited use of cars cause many problems. What are those problems ? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people ro use cars ? 84
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 67
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 73
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e becoming increasingly familiar to the general public. Firstly, the widespread use of cars ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, well, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98955613577 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88289909159 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584856396867 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4192278068 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9333333333 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308489736597 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962094839824 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724528142665 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176740106271 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341888166814 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.