The given chart compares the percentage of households possessing and renting accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. On the whole, the household owing and renting accommodation saw a fluctuating trend from 1918 to 2011. Moreover, the households owing accommodation underwent an upward trend, while the renting households experienced a downward trend throughout the given period.
Turning to the detail, in 1918, over 75% of households rented their accommodation, which is the maximal percentage among the given years. However, the percentage of households renting the accommodation had reached to its lowest point in 2001, at around 31%. By the same token, the maximal number of household that owned accommodation could be observed in 2001, standing at nearly 70%. In contrast, in the year 1918 witnessed the lowest figure in terms of household possessing accommodation, amounted to just over 20%.
The most striking point is the similarity in 1971, with both category accounting for 50%.
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from Internet for no charge.To what extend is this a positive or a negative development? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, while, in contrast, on the whole, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49358974359 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07437795379 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0744707278 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435375706215 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197871834116 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177813925788 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231823189849 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185284037109 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.