Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable.
Discuss both view and give your opinion
People have different views on whether people interact more or less under the influence of technology innovations. Modern technology brings people closer than ever.
The main reason explains why people think that advancement of technology makes people less socially active is that people are spending more time on it rather than interact with each other. For example, children now prefer playing video games than having a small talk with their parents. Furthermore, due to the development of communication applications, likes WhatsApp, people are rarely talking over phones, instead, they communicate by texting each other. It, in the result, hinders face-to-face interaction of people and making them less sociable.
However, I consider people are more extroverted with the aid of modern technology. Firstly, technology allows people to keep in contact with others without a physical barrier. For instance, people are able to make friends and share their view to others who lived on the side of the planet. Secondly, advancement of technology shortened the travelling time which allows people to meet more frequently. In the past, I required 3 hours train journey to visit my grandparents. The long journey really discouraged me from visiting them. Thanks to the upgrade of the train operation system, it only takes 1.5 hours now. I can now visit them more frequently. Finally, people are more willing to express themselves through social media. The emerging of social media, like youtube, acts as a new channel for people to express their thoughts and communicate with others.
In sum, people may be less sociable to some extent because of modern technology. However, people are brought closer and contact more frequently by technology innovations.
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable.Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life. To what extent do you agree or disagr 73
- Some people think that the only purpose of working hard is to earn money. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 56
- Forests are the lungs of the Earth. Destruction of the world's forests amount to death of the world, we currently know. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...on system, it only takes 1.5 hours now. I can now visit them more frequently.&n...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 915, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ughts and communicate with others. In sum, people may be less sociable to s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68248175182 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36980706555 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616788321168 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.671054302 49.4020404114 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 129.75 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348164021801 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136432188857 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106135709019 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250817554644 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391907762804 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.