Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are different kinds of classes. Those that are with open discussion and almost no lectures and those with lecture and almost no discussion. Both have their characteristic and importance. In my view, I prefer classes with open discussion between the professor and students and almost no lectures for two reasons.
First, classes with open discussion and almost no lecture are very didactic and this made that students learn faster. During open discussion, every student in class can express different points of view and share new knowledge that were not taught during the lecture. For example, I remember when I was studying dentistry in Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Anatomy classes were an open discussion between students and the professor, we almost did not have lectures. I loved those kinds of classes because I felt that I learned fast. Everyone shared their knowledges and opinions. I remember one day the professor made a hard question, each one mentioned an idea until we got the last answer. I always got a high score in anatomy classes because the way that classes were given made me learn easy the subject. As you can see classes with open discussion allow students to learn fast.
Second, classes with open discussion are less bore. That keeps the student participating actively during the lessons. All of the students debate ideas and flow a storm brain. For example, I remember when I was in high school the Math teacher wrote a problem in the board with a few possible solutions, he started reading the problem and every student had to explain what was the correct answer and why the others were incorrect. At the end of the class all of us understood the math problem and at the same time enjoyed the class without get bore. The Math professor always had an art to get the attention of us. This showed me that classes with open discussion are also less bore.
In sum up, though there are two kinds of classes with their own characteristics. Classes with open discussion and almost no lecture would be better for students to learn fast and do not get bore easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | hnftskn | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Lao Zhiquan | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to participate in a group project at work. They want you to work with someone who has opinion very different than yours. Moreover, he feels very strongly about these opinions.Do you think this is 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- smokng cigarettes and high taxes 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are different kinds of classes. Th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd almost no lectures for two reasons. First, classes with open discussion and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 533, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...f classes because I felt that I learned fast. Everyone shared their knowledges and o...
^^^^
Line 2, column 815, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e given made me learn easy the subject. As you can see classes with open discussio...
^^
Line 2, column 883, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...open discussion allow students to learn fast. Second, classes with open discussio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scussion allow students to learn fast. Second, classes with open discussion are...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ticipating actively during the lessons. All of the students debate ideas and flow a storm ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...e would be better for students to learn fast and do not get bore easily.
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...learn fast and do not get bore easily.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, for example, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82777777778 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51859749332 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461111111111 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4109870602 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7619047619 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47619047619 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465231972987 0.236089414692 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146412033067 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134767792667 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324953963128 0.150856017488 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916876748424 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.