The maps illustrate the developments that have taken place in a town called Frenton during a period of 22 years between 1990 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that Frenton experienced a significant transformation over the time show. Particularly, there were fewer trees remained and more buildings constructed.
Only the school and library in the west of High Street remained unchanged for 22 years. The playing fields with trees in the north of Frenton, for example, were replaced with numerous flats, while the hospital was expanded to meet the citizens’ needs. Furthermore, the bank in the west was demolished to make space for a new restaurant; whereas the trees in the southwest were cut down to make way for the construction of a technopark.
Meanwhile, the café and park area, located in the east of High Street was replaced with a hotel and golf course. Moreover, houses in East Frenton were also reconstructed into blocks of flats and there was the appearance of groups of flats in the north of the town. One further development, in Southwest Frenton, was the construction of a new cinema and supermarket, in replacement of the theatre and shops.
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005. 84
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03608247423 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97649505246 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9924154039 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11947129371 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506584069076 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805624153209 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946557180992 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101327300259 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.