The graph shows information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010
The line chart illustrates the number of global conferences which hosted in three capital cities from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is evident that there existed a slight decrease in the number of international meeting in City A and City B between 1980 and 2010. Meanwhile, that City C witnessed the most remarkable rise during almost the researched period.
In 1980, City A is the most popular metropolitan of international conferences, with 35 meetings being hosted, while the number of worldwide congresses in City B was smaller, just at 30 ones. However, after a 25-year period with a variation trend in both of City A and City B, the hosting of universal meeting in two cities met at about 28 conferences in 2005. In 2010, the figures for both of the two cities declined, with about 26 for City B and around 24 for City A.
In contrast, the city hadn’t hell any conferences in 1980, the number of the international meeting in City C surged and reached a peak at 35 in 2010. Despite, there was a marginal reduction in the data of City C from 2005 to 2010, the number of the global meeting in City C remained the highest one (at approximately 31) of three cities in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-16 | miavu27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | DynNgyn | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | Sonamchoden | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | phuong cao | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58293838863 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80835181525 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483412322275 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0285597763 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376508540994 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19635260462 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776135575173 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268110851493 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430988705115 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.