Incontrovertibly, in the new millennium the average of people age has increased, irrespective of their gender
Incontrovertibly, in the new millennium the average of people age has increased, irrespective of their gender, in comparison with their previous generation. In such a context, some people unlike many others, aver that the retirement age should be incremented dramatically. By my reckoning, this idea is increasingly under fire for a multitude of sensible reasons.
Firstly and foremost reason which opponents of this claim maybe mentioning is that employees should have time to spare with their beloved family members and for themselves after ages of work. If the authorities postponed the retirement age considerably, the workforce will suffer greatly in this regard. Due to the fact that typical senescence members of the community combat with diverse ailments they can not enjoy their life to the fullest. Therefore, it is quite logical that they retired far before this age to allocate some time to their interests. In addition to this, the work productivity may shrink in senior employees which could contribute to devastating results not only for the corporation, but also for the community as a whole. Besides, if the workforces get retired sooner there will be a better employment prospect for the new generation.
It is true to say that city planners have to use the experience of elderly people in various sectors. However, prolonging the work period is not the only conceivable way in this regard and there are far more beneficial tactics for utilizing them without damaging their rights.
To sum up, according to the aforementioned remarks it appears that increasing the retirement age is an unwise method and could violate the rights of employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-29 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
- It is true to say that in the new millennium and by the advent of technological devices involving smartphones and security cameras people are being watched constantly. 78
- The line graph compares the rate of burglary, car theft, and robbery in Newport city over the course of nine years. 73
- The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations. 78
- It is true to say that the usage of fast food could contribute to devastating health problems 73
- The pie charts compare online sales in four main areas for retail sectors in Newzealand in two different time spans. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23970037453 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98451351229 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8546730731 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.583333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282289066076 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107205635914 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199074189963 0.0667982634062 298% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171387910056 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181286434414 0.056905535591 319% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.