the line chart compares how much time it would take for 3 companies to manufacture a car from 2000 to 2012.
The graph illustrates how many days spent to build a car by three different manufacturers between 2000 and 2012.
It is clear that while the manufacturing cycle of a car from Honda and Toyota experienced the stability, that of Ford witnessed a dramatic increase during the period shown. Additionally, Toyota was by far the fastest company to make a complete car.
In 2000, Honda took nearly 33 days to manufacture an automobile, followed by about 28 days in Ford company. In comparison, Toyota spent least time producing a car, for approximately 18 days. Then both figures from Honda and Toyota slightly rose to about 35 days and just over 20 days respectively when there was a sudden drop in Ford company until reaching its lowest point, at about 11 days in 2004.
Honda spent more days to produce a car in the following years and stabilized at about 35 days in 2012. At the same period, there was a marginal fall in the figure of Toyota in 2008 and remained unchanged after that, at about 28 days. By contrast, Ford spent the exact 40 days on building a car in 2012, which was the highest number on the survey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-05 | minhumm | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-06 | quanganh3110 | 78 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period. 89
- A rise in the standard of living in a country only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference causes? How might these problems reduce? 78
- The protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world 60
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 87
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
... in Ford company. In comparison, Toyota spent least time producing a car, for approximately...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64824120603 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64341669568 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577889447236 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5051437063 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176181146465 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088949620035 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558968099465 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131736183672 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516359685004 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.