When people search information, they tend to focus on one resource. I agree with the statement that a person must get information from many different news sources. These are the following reasons: the information must be proven, different points of view is a significant way to have information, personal experience can be an information as well.
To begin with, information in the internet which people can access easily, includes the inaccurate resources. Since everyone can provide data to the others, we must assume that the report could be driven by an amateur. For instance, when I do the researches in the school, the teachers forbid us to use wiki-tree- a site for research due to the possibility that inexpert writer edited the article. In addition, I also had my friend who like to share her tips on makeup in the YouTube; the information from her which shared abroad was wrong and bad to skin.
Second, interpretations on the same subject could be all different as following the fact that the standards of people varies. If we are able to have more opinions on one aspect, we will be able to have more rounded condition on the strand of object. As an example, when the government does the survey, they collect the forms from all different groups such as ages, jobs, and locations. In doing this, the government can have an accurate data.
Third, one of the ways to get information is having experiences directly. If we get the knowledge only from internet or books, we cannot get the information from real field unless the author of the data experienced it himself. Waiting for the reporter from the real field will be a waste of time. In my case, when I was curious about sat test on biology, I was not able to understand all the term for the exam until I took the exam. In other words, I was able to have information about the test after I took the test in real.
- marco polo 73
- TOEFL integrated Question the extinction of Steller s sea cow 87
- TOEFL essay: Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of student. Which do you prefer ? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to young people 80
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...that a person must get information from many different news sources. These are the following r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssume that the report could be driven by an amateur. For instance, when I do the ...
^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more rounded condition on the strand of object. As an example, when the governm...
^^
Line 7, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er words, I was able to have information about the test after I took the test in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, third, well, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67867867868 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67682641086 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528528528529 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1223359725 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.375 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244827499354 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864954169997 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11072565313 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160436334153 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110829249404 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.