The diagram below shows the development of the village of Kelsby between 1780 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The depicted diagram illustrates the alterations in Kelsby village across 120 years. It is apparent that the village was settled by people and had become more facilitated during the given period.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can easily pinpoint that in 1780 there were four farms on the left side of the river and the opposite side of houses was full of woods. After 80 years a new bridge was built up over the river and a road, which was lying between the river and homes began to serve for people. Additionally, while the number of woods halved and farms became only 2, the quantity of homes almost doubled and reached 200.
In XXI century, new schools with sports fields were ready for use and a new road between the homes, which soared by 300 in numbers, made the schools easily accessible. In addition, the farms were removed completely and instead of them new shops were constructed along the left side of the river. A special area for birds, standing at the end of the river, seems to be one of the most striking discrepancies.
All in all, the maps suggest that there were significant improvements in the village.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 81
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003, 2005 and 2007 83
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. 87
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and inustrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 80
- The table shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 63
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 202 200
No. of Characters: 915 1000
No. of Different Words: 119 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.77 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.53 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.368 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 19 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.01 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.222 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.395 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.681 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4