Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, using of computer games are dramatically increased especially in kids. Some people believe that children should not play such games because it is a waste of time. Others, as I do, believe that playing computer games not only is not a waste of time but also have several advantages for children. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore more in the following essay.
First of all, children can benefit from video games in order to flourish their intellectual abilities. There are a wide variety of educational games which are available on the Internet more than ever before. By spending time on such games kids not only are able to solve many complex problems which make them smarter but also may be interested in a specific science which can build up their future career. My own experience is a compelling example of what I mean, my little brother spent a lot of time mostly on gaming. When I noticed his interests to playing game, I Installed some educational games which was related to physics on his Tablet. After a while of playing such games, my brother asked me some complicated questions about the rule of physics. The game has encouraged him to be curious about science and now he has a great enthusiasm to being a physician and make progress day by day.
Moreover, video games keep kids from the dangerous environment of public society. Most parents have struggle with their children because they are full of energy and prefer plying outdoor most of the time. Computer games can be a good weapon to fight with such problems because by gaming kids are prevented from going outside, they can stay at home and play games and consume their energy. So, Computer games are a good alternative for children to keep them safe because they can do it at home. In addition, in some seasons like winter the weather is not good enough for outing. Therefore, gaming with their peers at home can avoid children getting sick.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that computer games can be beneficial for children. It can help them to study better and improve their educational skills, and protect them by provide a safe place for gaming to them.
- "let is burn" policy and its effects 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- edmontosaur and the hypothesis of their migration 78
- Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir and claims about the validation of the memoir 83
- Some adults believe that nowadays children’s behavior is worse than children’s behavior was in the past. These adults have suggested three actions that parents can do to help children ages 5-10 behave better ( for example by speaking more respectfully 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...physician and make progress day by day. Moreover, video games keep kids from the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'struggled'.
Suggestion: struggled
...nt of public society. Most parents have struggle with their children because they are fu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, i feel, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71052631579 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47267056499 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528947368421 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6264002682 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2105263158 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300725001608 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988510953247 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676197429562 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199537542039 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695031426628 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.