Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their family. Discuss
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Recently,
the phenomenon of a long time working and its corresponding impacts have
sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of affordable
work is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both
constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined
to believe that an optimum work-hours program can be plus and I will analyze
that throughout this essay.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">From a
social standpoint, scheduled working and family time can provide the society
with some noticeable effect which rooted in the fact that the merits of full-time
jobs, as well as spending time with family, are inextricably bound up.
According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an
academic experiment which discovered analytical results of spending too much
hours at work and its harmful effects of family life. Thus, beneficial
ramifications of both part-time jobs and family consideration time apparently
can be seen.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">Within the
realm of science, working rush hours might increase the consequence of exhausting,
low energy and inappropriate mood. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional
work timetable would relate to this reality that the demerits of unaffordable
cooperation pertain to boring long-hour working. As an example, some scientific
research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside
of non-stop working is correlated negatively with weakness on job and family
relationships efficacy. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion
of short-time of family leisure.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%;mso-ascii-font-family:
Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri">To conclude,
while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that
the benefits of the optimization of working hours and spending enough time with
family far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a vibrant and happy
workplace prove the significance of family relationships. But also pin point
the long-term implications.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
- The environment we are living in is a danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual? 80
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 80
- Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 11
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life Do you agree or disagree 90
- Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 73, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ered analytical results of spending too much hours at work and its harmful effects ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2464.0 1207.87684729 204% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 8.0522875817 5.00649968141 161% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 11.7977459073 2.71678728327 434% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630718954248 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 379.143842365 185% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.3 1.57093596059 146% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 154.639451629 50.4703680194 306% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 246.4 104.977214359 235% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 30.6 20.9669160288 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 32.0 4.12807881773 775% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157669928732 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067605205867 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537115000577 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529675899572 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613357460895 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.8 12.6369458128 252% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -18.19 53.1260098522 -34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.3 10.9458128079 213% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 30.0 11.5310837438 260% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 30.0 10.5123152709 285% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.