Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of children learning process and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of promoting learning by music is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that the classical music style can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a good piece of popular music can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of sensational results, as well as modern education methods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered outstanding effects on learning in kids. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both stylish music and progressive understanding apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, inappropriate education method for children might increase the consequence of poor music. Moreover, fundamental aspects of explicit content of lyrics would relate to this reality that the demerits of false teaching pertain to low progress. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of youth learning is correlated negatively with poor listening habits. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of aggressive reaction against treatment.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of special music effects on children learning process far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of masterpiece music genre prove the significance of kid’s life improvement, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67883211679 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19130064522 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660583941606 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9222163324 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197246972449 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617417269927 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431903088519 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114177343292 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519317272761 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.