Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author’s argument that Palean baskets were not uniquely palean is flawed. In the argument the author not only draws the conclusion based on the ambiguous word but also conclude the result based on the unavailability of the boats on the Palean. Furthermore, the author makes the conclusion more store based on these unwarranted assumption.
To begin, the conclusion is based largely on the unavailability of the boats nearby the Brim River. In doing so, the author fails to consider whether the archaeologists are yet to know about the boats, which may be yet to be discovered by the archaeologists. The assumption is that the as the woven baskets was recently found on the ancient village across the Brim River from Palaea and the boats were not found, palaea baskets weren’t solely of palean which is unwarranted.
Secondly the author assumes that the woven baskets were solely carried by the boats, which is itself not entirely convincing. There might have the flood across the Palaea River which flowed the basket to the adjacent village. Furthermore, the author suggest the strong conclusion based on the empirical data presented.
Examining various factors and reasons regarding the palean baskets identity of origin , the argument does not justify the reasons presented.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 68
- Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, be sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the passage. 3
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people forleadership in government, industry, or other fields is byinstilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which youagree or disagree w 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng the palean baskets identity of origin , the argument does not justify the reaso...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 28.8173652695 17% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 2260.96107784 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 207.0 441.139720559 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25603864734 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.56307096286 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83547894163 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 204.123752495 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 705.55239521 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7703243942 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.70786347227 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135648458329 0.218282227539 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055042912753 0.0743258471296 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523858886767 0.0701772020484 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799531545081 0.128457276422 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199107057707 0.0628817314937 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 98.500998004 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.