It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all students have always been involved in a great struggle to take a course with a well-educated, prestigious, and well-known teacher. Whereas some individuals debate that a professor who has recently gotten a prize for his research can be a great lecturer at the university, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that an evaluated teacher who actually everyone knows that he is great in his job is better. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by the underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, no one casts a shadow of doubt on the fact that the result of a documentary or survey can be reliable and every individual can easily make their decisions based on the obtained results of a survey. This fact really shows that if a teacher gets good grades on an evaluation process, he will be definitely a well-educated lecturer at the university and all students can benefit from his presence. An example can shed some light on this subject distinctly. Several years ago, when the head of the engineering department at the University of Melbourne wanted to select well-educated and courteous lecturer for Materials course, he conducted a survey between two individuals. Almost all students participated in that survey and polled to Norman Ashby. Subsequently, the dean of the department trusted to the survey and all students got great scores and became prosperous and successful in that course.
Moreover, there is no guarantee that if a teacher gets a fantastic and renowned prize in his field of study, he will be able to teach great and has a profound impact on his students. However, the results of a survey can readily prove that the selected person is the best choice in different minds. Under such a circumstance, this person will strikingly help students reach success and prosperity in their future’s life. An example drives this notion and idea dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, the elected professor helped us become familiar with different novel materials which were really applicable in Industry. He also found several prestigious positions for well-educated students in the Tesla Company. Notwithstanding, the other professor, who had an award in Melbourne, was selected for another course in that department, and as a result, the students noted that he did not much experience in teaching and was not able to transmit scientific points to students greatly.
In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that it is more momentous and paramount for students to take a course with a teacher who has recently voted most famous in a survey about his teaching ability. This is because the result of a survey is dependable and it is possible that a teacher with a fantastic award in his field of study cannot teach very well.
- It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 73
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task 45
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 3
- It is better to have friends who are intelligent or to have friends who have a sense of humor. 70
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08366533865 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05468328681 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511952191235 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7292054148 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.315789474 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4210526316 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112925425101 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331671814407 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307958518159 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751637970268 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158798518832 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.