International sporting events such as the Olympic Games and the Football World Cup provide an outlet for patriotic feelings, and help reduce international tensions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nationalism can be strengthen by the international sporting events like Olympic Games and the Football World Cup because nearly all supporters more likely yelling out as a form of their national identity and proud of it. This also help two countries that have conflicts reduce their tensions for showing that they can join the games sportively.
International sporting events is always associated with yelling out from the participant countries’ supporters, and this is completed by using their national stuffs like sticker and flag as to bring their identity and support the athletes or teams. Indonesia citizens for example, they have strong nationalism by singing Indonesia Raya, Indonesia national song during the football league in the Football World Cup 2017 as a form to boost players’ spirit because they fight for their nations’ victory. This proofs that yelling out affects both supports and players’ patriotic feelings.
Apart from the previous discussions, in the international sporting games many countries join as participants while there are countries that have conflict, but both of the conflicted countries play sportively without bringing their problems into the competitions. Russia an America are two strong countries which had conflicts more than a decade ago, but when they met in the Olympic Games 2018 seems like there was no problems between them because they showed that they appreciated each other. This makes the relations of that countries more healthier since the tensions was reduced.
It is clear that nationalism comes from supporters’ yelling out as to support their teams during the international sporting events. This also effective to fix the relations between conflicted nations since it reduces the tensions through playing sportively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-04 | Fayna Faradiena | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the result of a long term survey carried out by an environmental group into local wildlife population figures 78
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary schools types between 2000 and 2009. 73
- Some people argue that space exploration had more to do with national pride than international effort. To what extent do you agree with this?How do you think space exploration will change in the future? 61
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r teams. Indonesia citizens for example, they have strong nationalism by singing ...
^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...s makes the relations of that countries more healthier since the tensions was reduced. It i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while, apart from, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 5.60731707317 517% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60948905109 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93951538624 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529197080292 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1502711491 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.7 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190254394586 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844675448988 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404163066859 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130352451589 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546019666064 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.