News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
Images tend to be more eye catchy than the words. News articles are often published in paper or media along with the relevant photographs. Few audience think pictures convey more information than words. In this essay I would like to discuss my opinion that info-graphics are informative but words have their own prominence.
Because it takes less time to go through the picture forms, most of the people feel that info-graphs are more effective. While present generation are very busy in their lives, they don’t have much time to know what is happening around them. However, with in the limited time available everyone is interested to read through the newspapers and media, which is possible with the help of related images. For instance, a picture showing the budget in detail is very easy to analyse in fewer seconds compared to big paragraphs. As, the images are time saving, many people feel that they are effective than words.
Although many people feel that words are less important than images, written articles have their own significance in my opinion. Images can not disclose the entire information which may end up in gaining half knowledge. For example, an info-graphic about statistics may not be so detail to understand all the required information. While, written content can efficiently deliver the message irrespective of the images. Hence, words convey the content completely while images can do the same in certain instances only.
Therefore, I believe that info-graphics and words have their own significant marks on delivering the news. Though some argue that info-graphics are more efficient, words are equally important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun audience seems to be countable; consider using: 'Few audiences'.
Suggestion: Few audiences
...ia along with the relevant photographs. Few audience think pictures convey more information ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nderstand all the required information. While, written content can efficiently delive...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25283018868 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75731591024 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2832378856 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191149306699 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623726877209 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510284392482 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111533981324 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681859124781 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.