It is important that we maintain and protect the beautiful building of the past, even if it is expensive for countries to do so.
Do you agree with this statement?
Historical buildings are valuable treasures for a country and should be preserved even if the government needs to spend hefty amounts for it. I completely agree with this viewpoint and my position is outlined in this essay.
First of all, old and traditional buildings are of great architectural importance. Their sublime design attracts tourists and locals alike and is quite rare in modern structures. These historical edifices also give us an opportunity to learn about the glorious past. For example, the Roman Colosseum in Rome not only shows how awe-inspiring the ancient architectures were but also points out a massive arena used as a stadium for gladiators' fighting and has space to house around 50,000 spectators in tiered seating. This structure is a predominant representative of Roman culture and civilisation that modern historians cherish profoundly.
In addition to this, historical monuments also serve as the tourist magnetism in many countries. In today's world, many people plan their vacations on places of historical importance as they are curious to know more about the culture and traditions of the past. Many nations are benefited by these tourists as a result, they possess booming tourism industry. For instance, millions of tourists including international tourists visit Taj Mahal in India every year. This provides the government with a huge profit and also employs many locals, thus assisting government financially.
To conclude, I believe, it is worth spending money on ancient buildings as they not only possess historical importance but also a financial kernel for many governments.
- Nowadays, anyone can post information on the internet even if it is incorrect. As a result, most of the information we read is inaccurate. 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. 89
- Some people think that family life and parents have great influence on children’s development, while others consider that external influence plays a more important role in children’s life.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46031746032 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00311629528 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.756623991 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159960066924 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547329819076 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458029503345 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11026143478 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633992949543 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.