Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.
Women's contribution in building the civilisation is equally important to that of men and given the chances they can be equally adept to take responsibilities in higher management in a company. Gender equality is no longer a concept, but a proven way to accelerate the progress and therefore I strongly believe that a portion of higher positions in companies should be reserved for females.
To begin with, half of the world population is women and their empowerment determines the overall progress of a nation and its economy. If these women are kept away from decision-making positions, true empowerment of women would become impossible. To cite an example, when half of the decision makers in a large company are females, they can bring diverse perspectives and innovation to the company. Some of the Asian countries including Bangladesh and India have incorporated reserved seats in parliaments for women, and these female leaders have done a great deal to encourage women to actively contribute to the country's politics and business sector.
Furthermore, women in higher positions like in police force can better understand the crimes and injustice involving women and can propose better solutions to these issues. Similarly, almost every large company has a great portion of female consumers and having some female key employees would only ensure ways to attract more female customers and better serve them.
To conclude, allocating a certain portion of higher positions for women is not a courtesy to the women. Rather it ensures balanced working environment, innovation, happy female customers and women empowerment which are key ingredients to a sustainable progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | aghalandar | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | ks_grewal | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-26 | shivangi patel | 66 | view |
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully. Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time. Compare the benefits of planning free-time activities with the benefits of not making plans. 73
- When students are in large classes it is very hard for the teachers to give every student individual attention. What can educational authorities do about this? 73
- Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people who build the homes 56
- The only way to improve the safety on our own road is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders. 78
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...pectives and innovation to the company. Some of the Asian countries including Bangladesh an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...r women is not a courtesy to the women. Rather it ensures balanced working environment...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'sustainable progress'.
Suggestion: sustainable progress
...mpowerment which are key ingredients to a sustainable progress.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, similarly, so, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39015151515 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00315251792 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6264002703 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.3 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186497482452 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765067669816 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483419809142 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115142374808 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011624760009 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.