the two graphs show that the main sources of energy in the usa in 1980 and 1990
The two pie charts compare the consumption’s level in five types of energy, namely oil, natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power and nuclear power in America in two years 1980, 1990.
Overall, it is obvious that Americans preferred consuming natural powers to using new energies.
As can be seen clearly from the charts that, the proportion of nuclear power and coal consumers increased slightly .The figures of coal users rose from 22% to 27%. Whereas 10% of americans chose nuclear power in 1990, this number increased by more than 5% compare to 1980.
The data of oil and natural gas declined after 10 years. From ranking at the top by taking up 42% in 1980, the percentage of oil consumers decreased to 33% in 1990 while the proportion of natural gas users only dropped 1% and occupied 25% in 1990.
Finally, hydroelectric power had the consumers the least, it account for 5% and still remained in the whole period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | cupinsiuway | 11 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | Wulan | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
- the two graphs show that the main sources of energy in the usa in 1980 and 1990 84
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er and coal consumers increased slightly .The figures of coal users rose from 22% ...
^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... and coal consumers increased slightly .The figures of coal users rose from 22% to ...
^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accounts'?
Suggestion: accounts
...c power had the consumers the least, it account for 5% and still remained in the whole ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91772151899 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66206022717 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4810692209 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112107263104 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510501664769 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604804994848 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576962959096 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559473341246 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.