The chart below show the methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009.
The two pie charts illustrate the information about the different means of transportation used by individual for going to university between 2004 and 2009 for study or job.
To begin with, in 2004, 33 percent people were went to the university by bus and this then showed a gradual increase of about 13% to 46% in 2009. Car, on the other hand, was the only type of transportation which went down from 51% in 2004 to 28% in 2009.
Furthermore, the percentage of people preferred to travel by bicycle was 9 % in 2004 and it was inclined to 16 % in the next five year period. However, the percentage for train and walking were experienced a steap rose during the period of 5 year that is reached to 4 % and 6% respectively in 2009 from 3% and 4% in 2004.
Overall, the maximum number of people liked to travel by car in 2004 while minimum people used train as a mode of transportation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | Dhillon Simran | 73 | view |
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their meals. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status, 1989 - 1999 67
- Many people believe that mobile phones cause more harms than the benefits and that’s why mobile phones should be restricted? To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons to support. 78
- The diagrams below guve information on transport and car use in edmonton. 73
- Participation by 5 to 14 years old in selected leisure activities in Australia 41
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48148148148 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75276970465 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.0952969132 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382355346092 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172258033132 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856703923122 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218630804005 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780861355866 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.