The table below gives the number of percentage of 40-44 years old women with no child until more than four children were ever born from 1981 to 2006.
The table shows the data which contained information about the number of children that were given birth by the age of 40-44 years old women in Australia. This data was compiled since 1981 until 2006.
Generally, between 1981 until 2006, women having two children were the most popular, especially in 2006. On the opposite, in the year of 1981, no child was the lowest proportion from the whole period and from all the number of children.
From 1981 to 2006, it can be seen that two children were most likely to be born in 2006 at 38.3%. there was a significant difference between two children and one child in the same year, almost one third of the portion. In 1981, women with no child had the lowest percentage at 8.5%. But still, two children who were born in 1981, were the biggest number of percentage.
In the year of 1986, four or more children were almost two times lower than the two children. But 10 years later, the proportion was nearly threefold lower If compared to the previous category.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ost likely to be born in 2006 at 38.3%. there was a significant difference between tw...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66480446927 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30303154745 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7556717283 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486569065541 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189719336556 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778076432571 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28806564348 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689894289784 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.