The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in
Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The figure illustrates the consumption of fast food and the total expenditure spent by each person on weekly basis in Great Britain.
The graph shows increase in the hamburgers and pizza consumption from 1970 to 1990. The trend of eating hamburgers has massively increased from 100 grams consumption in 1970 to 500 grams in 1990. However, the use of fish and chips has relatively declined with the passage of time. In 1970, about 300 grams were consumed which reduced to 220 grams in 1990.
The interesting facts were revealed that the high income groups spent the most of their expenditures on fast foods. It shows that this group spends about 40 pence per week on hamburgers and just 17 pence per week on fish and chips. While the average income group has the highest number of money spent on fish and chips as compare to low and high income groups. The group with minimum income contributes presumably the lowest of all to fast foods consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Zoheeba | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Tami | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | yasamin27 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-16 | Sadia Akram | 67 | view |
| 2015-04-22 | Talha Shafqat | 70 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topicShould wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsi 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods inBritain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the hamburgers and pizza consumption from 1970 to 1990. The trend of eating h...
^^
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d pizza consumption from 1970 to 1990. The trend of eating hamburgers has massivel...
^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...es presumably the lowest of all to fast foods consumption.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7696969697 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46835620791 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4314242122 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.4444444444 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276164879558 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102837822977 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734614052712 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174517368401 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623704402264 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.