more money is spent on transportation in cities. what are the effects and what can be done.
There are certain nations where people prioritize cities over rural areas when it comes to utilizing funds for constructing roads and other transport facilities. As a result, it affects the overall development of such countries., There are multiple steps that must be taken for sorting out such an issue as described in the essay below.
To begin with, people start migrating in cities when they find countryside un-attractive or under-developed. It makes the cities overcrowded where the resources of such places are unable to meet the demands of the growing population. For instance, problems of space for building parks and water availability are very common in Chandigarh; a result of the mass inflow of people there. Another negative outcome of paying less attention to villages is that people leave their work such as farming and carpentry and move to the place with good infrastructure and better living conditions. Consequently, this creates an imbalance at every job market. To illustrate, three out of every five farmers work as laborers in cities today, according to the reports. So, people find it difficult to get jobs in cities whereas in villages the demands of the workforce are increasing. In sum, it affects the development of such nations.
One of the effective solutions would be for the governments to give equal weight to both cities and their counterparts. This could be justified as people staying in the underprivileged areas too are contributing to the economy through taxes. Hence, they deserve equal treatment. Secondly, encouraging industrialists to settle and run their businesses in places away from cities would help to mitigate the issues of comparative less development in villages. For example, the government would definitely pay attention if businesses start in villages. Furthermore, awakening people to raise their voice and demand justice would be a better option; after all, they too vote and have the right to fight against injustice.
In conclusion, villages are as important as cities. Governments should try their best to resolve the disparity of quality of life in both sectors. Spending money equally would aid countries to flourish. Perhaps in the future, people being made aware of their rights, there is hope that we will enjoy all the basic needs of life available everywhere in our countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | Ramandeep Dhillon | 11 | view |
- in many countries, more money is spent on the transport system in the cities. In contrast, very little is spent in rural areas. what are the effects of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 84
- it has been noted that people prefer to live in rented apartments. What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this trend? 78
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Although it is sometimes thought that machines play a significant role in easing lives of many workers, other people believe that these artificial brains have more of the detrimental effects.However, I consider that machines help masses do work efficientl 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions where people prioritize cities over rural areas when it comes to utiliz...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...nomy through taxes. Hence, they deserve equal treatment. Secondly, encouraging indust...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27466666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05762842012 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8104591068 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0589265242185 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0190297458137 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264151471623 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0412326522726 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251228082549 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.