The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrate the tourists to England who visited four differnt places in Brighton (art galler, pavilion, pier and festival) between 1980 to 2010. Unites are meachered in percentage.
Overall, the pier had fluctueted increased over that period. meanwhile the art gallery had peak in 1985 and then start to fell.
In 1980, was art gallery and pavilion has the same percentage just over 22% and 24% recpectively, both of them increased, the art galley had peak to 36% approximately also, pavillion reached to over 46%. The art gallery had a signifacently decreased to just under 10% in 2010. meanwhile, pavillion has a slightly decresed from 46% to 31% in 2010.
Wheares, the pier and festival were almost conservative in their percentage during the period. Firstly, festival had reached to 30% in in 1980 while pier was 10%. The pier had a slightly droped from 30% to 25% in 1995 and then had start rose to reached over 26%. Whearese pier had fluctueted over the period to reach over than 20% in 2010.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 65
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
... fluctueted increased over that period. meanwhile the art gallery had peak in 1985 and th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: meanwhile,
... fluctueted increased over that period. meanwhile the art gallery had peak in 1985 and th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...ly decreased to just under 10% in 2010. meanwhile, pavillion has a slightly decresed from...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... almost conservative in their percentage during the period. Firstly, festival had...
^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...d. Firstly, festival had reached to 30% in in 1980 while pier was 10%. The pier had a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was 10%. The pier had a slightly droped from 30% to 25% in 1995 and then had sta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88505747126 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63982728029 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9581196344 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2727272727 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.064201389078 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0266764483566 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680679239195 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607956855842 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911402618797 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.